NCCPR news and commentary round-up, week ending February 17, 2026

Before the look back, a brief look ahead: 

● There’s a big event on Feb. 26: Check out this webinar, sponsored by the National Association of Counsel for Children, on The Legacy of Control: The Racist Roots of the Family Policing System. 

And now the news: 

● Remember how horrified we were when we saw pictures of Liam, the five-year-old boy detained by ICE? In Psychology Today, psychiatrist Rupinder Legha wants us to remember something else: 

[F]amily separation is systemic and … its harm extends far beyond immigration enforcement. 

Child welfare, foster care, and juvenile justice follow the same logic—separating families in the name of safety. In practice, though, they often end up causing predictable harm through separation, surveillance, and displacement that land hardest on Black and Brown communities. There have been countless instances of Black, Latine, and Indigenous children being removed from their families under the guise of protection—when the real issue is poverty, not neglect.​ 

Dr. Legha urges the research and provider communities to change course: 

Research conducted in child welfare and juvenile detention tends to normalize family separation because it often develops and evaluates therapeutic interventions within the very institutions perpetuating toxic stress. One study found that Black parents receiving parent training while under child welfare surveillance were depressed. The authors suggested adding depression treatment—instead of recognizing the likely role that the surveillance itself was likely playing. 

This research is rooted in circular logic: The more detention harms children’s mental health, the more we study how to treat them there, when instead we ought to be questioning the harm of the system itself. …

Providers might believe they are helping people in need. But I believe that instead they're legitimizing the idea that healing is possible while detained, which contradicts what we know about trauma and safety. Such providers might, for example, prescribe sleep aids for insomnia caused by sleeping in an unfamiliar or unsafe facility and antidepressants for sadness rooted in separation from family. Medicalizing predictable responses to confinement makes it challenging for them to question the confinement itself.

● Consider, for example, the ongoing detention of another little boy, not by ICE but by the Oregon family police agency. And while, normally, one might at least be able to draw the distinction that the family police are well-motivated, in this case, that’s not so clear. 

Last year, Oregon lawmakers refused to pass a bill sought by the family police and the governor that would make it easier to exile kids to out-of-state institutions and harder to prevent abuse in group homes and institutions. It was one of the few times Oregon’s way-too-influential Senator Soundbite, who has done so much to make a bad system worse, actually did the right thing – she opposed the bill. This case, reported by Oregon Public Broadcasting, sounds like it may have been motivated by revenge, at a 9-year-old boy’s expense. 

● Last week’s round-up included a link to this stunning investigative report from The Marshall Project on how the family police harass new mothers who test positive for drug use – even when the test is wrong or the drug is medically prescribed. Well, some new mothers, that is. In a blog post, we compare what The Marshall Project found to what happens when the mothers are white and affluent. 

● New York’s greedy private foster care agencies are back seeking a bailout to pay their insurance premiums. The premiums are high because so many children have been abused on their watch. This blog post explains why, if the latest scheme becomes law, no matter how abominably agencies allow the children in their care to be treated, and how much that jacks up their insurance premiums, they need never change, secure in the knowledge that taxpayers will pick up the tab. 

● Georgia has a law that guarantees parents accused of abuse by a medical professional the right to a second opinion. But, of course, a doctor can’t provide a second opinion without the medical records. Families say some of the places that diagnosed alleged abuse are stonewalling when it comes to providing the medical records. So now, WXIA-TV reports, one lawmaker is introducing a bill to fine providers who fail to promptly provide those records. 

In this week’s edition of The Horror Stories Go in All Directions: 

● From the Redding Record Searchlight 

A young woman who said she was sexually abused by two men for years while living in a Shasta County foster home has sued her former foster parents, as well as a second man who she said repeatedly raped her. … 

The victim's aunt and her psychotherapist made reports to county officials in 2014, the lawsuit naming the Sheriff's Office said. No action was taken to investigate their claims, the suit alleged. 

At one point, the teen tried to tell a Shasta County official making a routine visit to the foster home in 2008 about the ongoing sexual abuse, said the lawsuit naming [the county child welfare agency]. The unidentified official who came to the home called her "a liar," the lawsuit said, and told her if any abuse was happening, she had been "asking for it."

Child welfare in New York: Beware of a backdoor bailout for private foster care agencies

If the latest scheme becomes law, no matter how abominably agencies allow the children in their care to be treated, and how much that jacks up their insurance premiums, they need never change, secure in the knowledge that taxpayers will pick up the tab. 

When state legislators started easing statutes of limitations to allow child abuse survivors to sue, the lawmakers probably had in mind institutions like churches, the Boy Scouts, etc. But it should have come as no surprise that a great many lawsuits have targeted private foster care agencies, because so very many children were abused on their watch (in the name of “child protection,” “child safety,” and “erring on the side of the child,” of course). 

Particularly vulnerable: agencies running the worst form of “care” – group homes and institutions. As a result, their insurance premiums have skyrocketed. Some agencies even had to close. 

Here’s the most important thing to understand: Private agencies that run group homes and institutions having to shut down is not a crisis or a calamity. On the contrary, it’s great news! As I posted two years ago: 

The group homes and institutions are harmful even when they´re not rife with physical and sexual abuse.  The whole model is a proven failure, and there are far better alternatives.  But these giant, greedy, well-connected agencies are scarfing up all the money for such alternatives. (And when I say greedy: Have you seen Ron Richter´s salary for running one of them?) 

[Update: he’s left, but continues to ally with those wedded to a take-the-child-and-run approach to child welfare.] 

But the agencies are doing what they do best: predicting that horrible calamities will befall children unless they get some kind of bailout and/or near immunity from accountability to all those children horrifically abused on their watch. 

Two years ago, California agencies predicted foster children would suddenly be homeless if they had to close. I explain here why that is nonsense. Sice them, at least 19 California agencies reportedly have closed, and yet the counties that run child welfare in California apparently are coping just fine. It helps, of course, that California has been safely and steadily reducing the number of children torn from their families in the first place. 

Nevertheless, California fell for the fearmongering, at least in part. So far, New York has not. 

But according to Insurance Business, an insurance industry trade publication, those greedy agencies are trying again. This time, they’ve gotten at least two lawmakers to introduce a bill to provide a so-called $20-million “bridge fund.” Worse, the bill would require the state agency that sets rates for these places to make absolutely positively sure the rates are set so high they cover the entire cost of insurance. 

This is a backdoor bailout. Under this provision, no matter how abominably agencies allow the children in their care to be treated, and how much that jacks up their insurance premiums, they need never change, secure in the knowledge that taxpayers will pick up the tab. 

And if anyone needs another reminder of why that’s a bad idea, check out this lawsuit settlement in California – in a case where, one would have thought, the private agency would have been especially vigilant.

Image from Easy Peasy AI

Since the child welfare establishment keeps telling us there’s no racism in their field, there must be some other explanation for this:

 

This is what happens when Black mothers use marijuana gummies (From The Marshall Project):

 Ayanna Harris-Rashid was sitting up in bed, her newborn son latched to her breast, one hand scrolling on her phone, when the police called. She was wanted on a felony charge of child neglect. 

Harris-Rashid had just had her third child in March 2021. To ease pain and frequent nausea, she had used legal CBD gummies and a topical hemp-based ointment throughout her pregnancy. But at the hospital, she and the baby tested positive for marijuana, prompting providers to file a report with the South Carolina Department of Social Services, which forwarded the information to police, records show. Now an officer was demanding that Harris-Rashid turn herself in. 

Harris-Rashid said goodbye to her children and husband. “I’m so sorry,” she whispered to her newborn son. A friend drove her to the sheriff’s office, where she was handcuffed, strip-searched and placed for the night in a cold and crowded cell. By the time she left the jail the following morning, her milk supply had decreased and she found she could no longer breastfeed. The charge was eventually dropped. 

“They shook me bare. They made me feel very indecent and inhumane,” she said, adding, “This is a person, a woman, a mother, an actual individual. What justifies this?” 

This is what happens when white mothers use marijuana gummies (From Boston Magazine): 

Cannabis gummies have become as ubiquitous as Lululemon leggings and UppaBaby strollers, particularly among millennial mothers in their thirties and early forties. Moms are popping edibles as they’re folding laundry in the evening, before heading to back-to-school night, and during Friday-afternoon playdates. They’re setting up elaborate home bars decked out with cannabis-infused drinks and bowls of colorful gummies and hosting Cannabis & Crafts nights. … 

The first time [Kate] tried a gummy, “it was just wonderful,” she says. The self-dubbed “100 percent type A” mother found herself less wound-up and more relaxed with her two children. And she appreciates that she’s not drinking in front of her kids. At a Fourth of July gathering, Kate split a gummy with her close friend as the children ran around the yard. ... It’s been a good fix for me.”

NCCPR news and commentary round-up, week ending February 10, 2026

● The Marshall Project has a stunning expose of the extent to which mothers are harassed at birth – and children torn away during the days they need their mothers most, their first, -- after what often are false positive drug tests or positive tests for substances that are no problem for white, middle-class mothers, such as marijuana gummies. It happens far more often that previously thought.  Some examples from the story: 

In Oklahoma, armed sheriff’s deputies took two children from their parents after the mother tested positive for meth, a false result triggered by an acid reflux medication the hospital had given her during labor, according to court records and her lawyer. In South Carolina, police interrogated a mother after she tested positive for the fentanyl from her epidural, as well as marijuana, according to police records. 

And after a Virginia couple insisted on having an attorney present for a child welfare interview, a police officer threatened them with arrest if they didn’t surrender their newborn. “When we step in, that’s when we start charging people,” the officer told the parents, according to an audio recording of the meeting. “You got about three seconds.” The mother had tested positive for methadone, the medication prescribed to treat her opioid addiction. The parents were forced to leave their newborn in the hospital and police escorted them out, records show.

● As you read this story from USA Today, about a grandmother’s heroic fight for her grandchildren, I hope you will take special note of the role of the so-called guardian ad litem – and what it says about allowing those supposedly looking out for a child’s “best interests” to inflict their own biases. 

●  Oklahoma Watch reports that Oklahoma is the latest state taking first steps toward boosting one of the most effective ways to keep children safe: providing high-quality family defense. Perhaps most notable is the vivid description of what “representation” is like where this program does not exist (and that’s what it’s like in most of the country). 

● The Imprint takes a close look at the decision by the federal Administration for Children and Families to allow the medication used for Medication-assisted treatment of substance use disorder to be funded under the Family First Act. The story also discusses the bias against this treatment among many in the family police community and the harm that’s done to children. But the story has a reminder: What the Trump Administration gives with one hand, it may take away with another. The primary source of federal reimbursement for these medications is Medicaid – and Trump’s budget is expected to cut millions off from Medicaid. 

● Here we go again: Still another study on the benefits of concrete help to families. This one, in JAMA Pediatrics, shows that the availability of universal pre-kindergarten significantly reduces the number of children forced to endure an investigation concerning alleged “neglect.” The results were particularly strong for nonwhite children. 

● In Utah, legislative auditors issued another one of those ScathingReports on a state family police agency. I have a column in the Utah News Dispatch about why this ScathingReport is different: It recognizes that the tragic errors go in all directions. Speaking of which … 

In this week’s edition of The Horror Stories Go in All Directions: 

● From The Imprint

 A mother whose baby died in a Los Angeles County foster home has been awarded $9 million to settle a lawsuit against the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) and one of its social workers. 

According to court records, Erick Lee died in 2022 from severe dehydration in a foster parent’s home where two other children had previously died. Earlier that year, another foster child placed in the home passed away of unknown circumstances, but no autopsy took place. The foster parent’s biological son also died in 2018, as a result of untreated diabetes. 

● From the San Antonio Express News 

A New Braunfels woman was sentenced for 40 years in prison for keeping children in cages and denying them food to the point of malnutrition, Comal County officials say. 

Susan Rae Helton, 53, was convicted of four counts of injuring a child and causing serious bodily injury in an abuse case that involved two of her adopted children, according to the Comal County District Attorney’s Office. 

● And sometimes, as the Associated Press reports, the horror stories go in all directions for the same children: 

A Southern California county and a foster care agency have agreed to a $13.5 million settlement with six children who were placed in an abusive home after being rescued from squalid and abusive conditions in their parents’ home. 

Riverside County will pay $2.25 million to six of the Turpin children, most of whom are now adults, and ChildNet, a care agency, will pay $11.25 million, according to a copy of the settlement.

NCCPR in the Utah News Dispatch: Fixing DCFS requires understanding that the tragic errors go in all directions

By now, so many oversight agencies in so many states have issued reports about those states’ child welfare systems, and those reports so often are accurately described as “scathing,” that it may as well be one word. 

But the ScathingReport issued by the Utah Office of the Legislative Auditor General concerning the state Division of Child and Family Services includes a commendable difference: It recognizes that in “child welfare,” the terrible mistakes go in all directions. Understanding that is essential if DCFS is ever going to be fixed. ...

Read the full column in the Utah News Dispatch

NCCPR news and commentary round-up, week ending February 3, 2026

● All over the country, new mothers are reported to the family police when a drug test allegedly reveals not drug abuse but medication-assisted treatment for drug abuse. In other words, they’re taking prescribed medications, such as buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone, that reduce the craving for opioids and symptoms of withdrawal. But censorious family police workers and judges (secure in the knowledge that no one will be barging into their homes to check their liquor cabinets or watching them smoke pot during their children’s playdates), investigate them, condemn them, and often tear their children from them. 

Now the federal government is putting its weight behind a change in course. Writing in The Imprint, the new head of the federal Administration for Children and Families, Alex Adams, announced that these medications are now approved for federal reimbursement under the Family First Act. 

Also in that commentary: an encouraging framing of his priorities: 

ACF is aligning its policies to increase the ratio of foster homes to foster children. This gives states two focuses: increasing the numerator of foster homes or, more importantly, safely reducing the denominator of children in the foster care system. 

● Fresh from giving a giant rate increase to a group home provider (and big campaign contributor) with a questionable track record, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs is lavishing an even bigger pay raise on foster parents – and effectively making poor people pay for it. I have a blog post about it. 

● amNY and Courthouse News Service report on a decision by a federal appellate court that revives a lawsuit brought by New York foster youth. They were arbitrarily denied the right to live with their own extended families in kinship foster care. 

● The Seattle Times has a story about another approach to high-quality legal representation, helping families before problems reach the point where the family police intervene. 

We have updates on two cases in which states passed “reasonable childhood independence” laws, but caseworkers ignored those laws and traumatized families. 

● ABC News reports on a case in Georgia. 

● Reason has an update on a case in Utah. 

In this week’s edition of The Horror Stories Go in All Directions: 

● When Honolulu Civil Beat was able to pry loose the records concerning a child who allegedly was, in effect, adopted to death, the records revealed the extent of the willful blindness of a family police agency desperate to get its adoption numbers up.

Arizona governor robs poor families to give middle-class foster parents a giant pay raise

 

It’s almost as if Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs stole a page from Donald Trump’s playbook. She’s moving to attract greedy potential foster parents to join the majority who are not in it for the money. And the way she is doing it is the equivalent of telling poor families: We’re going to build a wall between you and your children – and we’re going to make you pay for it! 

Fresh from giving a giant rate increase to a group home operator (and generous campaign donor) with a questionable record, Hobbs is lavishing an even bigger rate increase – 50% -- on state foster parents, who already do quite well. 

As of 2022, depending on a child’s age and needs, foster parents got anywhere from $637 to $1,465 per month. That’s per child, not per family. Hobbs says that, with the rate increase, foster parent reimbursement will average between $1,000 and $1,700 per month. 

All of that is tax-free. Foster children’s health insurance is covered, and in some cases, working foster parents can even get childcare aid; the kind of aid that, had it gone to birth parents, might have prevented children being taken for “lack of supervision.” 

I don’t think most foster parents are in it for the money. But wouldn’t we all like to keep it that way? Do we really want someone who says, “I won’t do it for less than $1,000 a month, tax-free, plus health insurance for the kids and maybe a childcare subsidy” to be a foster parent? 

Now, let’s consider who’s footing the bill: 

When Congress replaced “welfare as we knew it” with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, the money was supposed to help impoverished families become self-sufficient. But the rules are so vague that some states have turned TANF into a child welfare slush fund. 

In that regard, Arizona is a national leader, diverting more than 60% of TANF funds away from impoverished families.  As ProPublica explained: 

Welfare in Arizona largely goes not to helping poor parents financially but rather to the state’s Department of Child Safety — an agency that investigates many of these same parents, and that sometimes takes their kids away for reasons arising from the poverty that they were seeking help with in the first place. 

How much more good could that TANF money do if it were actually used to help poor people? There’s a clue in why Arizona children are taken away – it’s almost never because of the horror stories that make headlines. 

Of all the Arizona children torn from their families and thrown into foster care in 2024, 87%  did not involve even an allegation of physical or sexual abuse. In fact, almost as many children were taken because of “inadequate housing” as because of physical and sexual abuse combined. 

Hobbs claims the state has to lure in more foster parents with big bucks in order to have places for children now needlessly confined to group homes and institutions. 

Arizona is, indeed, a horrific outlier in this regard. It throws 41% of foster children into group homes and institutions; the national average is 16%. (That kind of makes you wonder why she also gave that big increase to some of those same group homes and institutions.) 

But the solution to overuse of group homes can be found in another ugly Arizona statistic: The state still tears apart families at a rate 25% above the national average, even when rates of child poverty are factored in. Stop taking so many children needlessly, often when family poverty is confused with neglect, and there will be plenty of room in the foster homes Arizona already has. 

Hobbs adds insult to family injury by implying that she is providing some special benefit to extended family members who provide kinship foster care. But the giant pay raise applies only to licensed foster parents. Federal law already requires that all licensed foster parents – whether kin or strangers – be paid the same amount. 

The biggest problem in foster care rates is the lack of support for relatives who provide safe, loving homes, but may not be able to meet licensing requirements that can be geared more to middle-class creature comforts instead of only health and safety necessities. Hobbs' giant pay raise doesn’t apply to them. 

And when it comes to discretionary spending, Hobbs took away $6.5 million in support for kinship foster care – and diverted it to group homes and institutions. 

Brick by financial brick, Gov. Hobbs builds an ever-higher wall between children and the families who love them – and makes those families pay for it.